YugSamvad · Politics & History
Politics & HistoryWill the media apologize for defaming Hindus in the Bulandshahr violence?
प्रवक्ता · English edition 18 October 2026 · Hindi original 8 December 2018 · 6 min read
Following the Bulandshahr incident, anti-national elements with Leftist ideology are beaming with joy. The joint effort of both is to defame Hindus once again after the Akhlaq episode. The Leftist media has also joined hands in this endeavour. This news aiming to malign Hindus has been amplified across the seven seas, reaching America and Britain. The narrative web of "Hindu terrorism" is once again being spun through a maze of words. In this din, the truth has either been buried or cleverly suppressed by the Left-sponsored media—both mean the same thing. From within the country to abroad, there is only one clamour: that Hindus killed a police officer.
No one is revealing the truth of how 40 cows were barbarically slaughtered in a sugarcane field in Mahav village. No one is telling the truth that when eyewitnesses Shikhar Kumar and Saurabh saw Sudef Chaudhary, Ilyas, Sharafat, Anas, Sajid, Sarfuddin, and Parvez slaughtering the cattle, the accused were named on this very basis. So why did the police not immediately depart towards Nayagaon to apprehend them? No one is revealing the truth as to who has been provoking Hindus for the past several months by regularly slaughtering cows in Bulandshahr.
No action against cow slaughterers for months
Peace-loving Hindus remained quiet even on 6 June when several cows were slaughtered in New Mandi of Kotwali Dehat. They were silent even on 17 July when gokashi (cow slaughter) took place in Imaliya village of New Mandi. They remained silent on 30 July as well when numerous cows were ruthlessly killed in an orchard in Ridhavali, and the helpless Hindus remained silent on 31 July too when cow slaughter took place in Daulatpur, as well as on 17 November in Islamabad village.
According to post-mortem report, Inspector and Sumit were shot with the same pistol
By managing the media, the police administration is undoubtedly trying to use the incident of Chingrawati, Mahav, and Naya Gaon in Siana, Bulandshahr as a victim card to gain sympathy and give a different twist to the narrative. But the reality is that it was a grave mistake on the part of the police to lathi-charge the public. Meanwhile, in the chaos, 20-year-old Sumit died from a bullet fired by an unidentified person. Only after that did the enraged crowd resort to stone-pelting.
Anyone may malign the Vishva Hindu Parishad, Bajrang Dal, and Hindu activists all they want; but the fact that the post-mortem report shows both Sumit and Inspector Subodh were shot with a .32 bore weapon paints a clear picture of the entire matter. The reality is that the crowd did not even have sticks or lathis, let alone guns.
When the police hesitated to register a report on cow slaughter, anger mounted among local villagers, and some announced a road blockade until an FIR was registered against the cow slaughterers. The crowd wanted to take the tractor loaded with slaughtered cattle onto the highway to block the road, where vehicles of Tablighis were passing. The police stopped the crowd fearing a clash.
If the police had taken the crowd into confidence with empathy and restrained them, this incident would not have occurred. However, the inspector escalated matters by using harsh measures against the crowd, which was already angry due to prior inaction. In an attempt to clear the road, the police or an unknown person fired directly, resulting in Sumit's death and injuring several others; only then did the enraged crowd resort to stone-pelting. According to eyewitnesses, the police fired the bullet that hit Sumit, and a young boy died due to police firing. Police negligence coupled with police homicide further fueled the crowd's outrage, yet no demonstrator attacked the police because the protesters had no weapons at all. But at that very moment, a soldier named Jitendra Malik alias Jeetu shot the inspector—likely stemming from an old enmity with the inspector—and he was not part of the protest. All the blame for this personal rivalry was pinned onto Hindus.
From 1 December, a gathering of crores of Muslims had assembled in Dariyapur, Bulandshahr. To arrange meat for them to eat, incidents of Muslims illegally slaughtering cows in the forests of surrounding villages were taking place. Local villagers were continuously informing the police administration about this, but the police were taking no action. For this reason, residents from several nearby villages gathered to demand action from the administration and to tackle the cow slaughterers.
But naive Hindus, agitated after the slaughter of 25–30 cattle in Mahav village yesterday, made the mistake of going to the police outpost to lodge a report. It was the mistake of Hindus to expect any action from a police force that fears slaughterhouse owners. Nor did the police consider that the people before them were agitated. As a result, the label of "Hindu terrorism" was forcibly stamped onto their foreheads. Will the country's police ever overcome their fear of slaughterhouse butchers and stand with the law? Now, the police administration is trying to save its own skin by wrongfully registering an FIR against 27 residents of nearby villages belonging to Jat, Tyagi, Lodhi, Rajput, and various other communities.
Meanwhile, the conclusion of the inquiry report conducted by ADG Intelligence S.B. Shiradkar on the instructions of Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath is that "the police administration is responsible for the Bulandshahr violence." Shiradkar's report terms Inspector Subodh's death an accident and explicitly denies any incident of mob lynching. Yet, to oppose Hindus, the media immediately pounced on this case and made every attempt to defame VHP and Sangh leaders. Naxal and Leftist journalists like Barkha Dutt and Ravish Kumar portrayed Hindus as terrorists, whereas the truth turned out to be quite the opposite. Now the big question is: Will the anti-Hindu media apologize to Hindus for its false propaganda?
Yogi Adityanath's reprimand on administrative negligence regarding cow slaughter
Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath termed the entire incident a conspiracy. Expressing displeasure, Yogi Adityanath questioned how this illegal activity was taking place when illegal slaughterhouses had been shut down since 19 March 2017. Severely reprimanding senior police officers, the Chief Minister asked how long cow slaughter had been going on in Bulandshahr, emphasizing that this did not happen overnight. In light of this incident, the Chief Minister instructed the DMs and SPs of all districts that officers of districts where such illegal activities occur will be held directly and personally accountable. He stated that the Bulandshahr incident must be investigated thoroughly and strict action taken against everyone involved in cow slaughter. He directed the time-bound arrest of all persons directly or indirectly connected to cow slaughter.
Here is the complete truth behind Yogi Adityanath's statement on the caste of Hanumanji
Cite this article
प्रवक्ता. “Will the media apologize for defaming Hindus in the Bulandshahr violence?”. YugSamvad, 18 October 2026. https://yugsamvad.com/en/articles/bulandashahara-hinsaa-men-hinduon-ko-badanaama-karane-ke-lie
https://yugsamvad.com/en/articles/bulandashahara-hinsaa-men-hinduon-ko-badanaama-karane-ke-lie · accessed
Related reading
Karpatraratnasamuchchaya and Tradition-ism | Including 'Kutarkakootnashak' (Destroyer of False Logic)
This following essay is written by @RamaInExile.Trad: The events of the past few months have shaken me to my core. I was completely unaware of the true nature of the elements within these events. Like a tadpole, my worldview began to undergo a metamorphosis. In the name of Trad vada (Trad traditionalism), dharma...
18 October 2026 · 63 min read

Be It Kanyadaan or Vardaan: What Is Wrong with It?
Is *kanyadan* (the ritual offering of the bride) merely charity? Why is *kanyadan* performed, and is it an insult to women? Understand the true meaning of *kanyadan* in the Hindu *vivaha sanskara* (marriage sacrament), along with its cultural and Vedic significance. Read the authentic exposition of *vardan* (boon) versus *kanyadan*, the mystery of *Brahma vivaha* (the Brahma form of marriage), and a definitive response to the fallacies that seek to misrepresent Hindu traditions.
18 October 2026 · 5 min read
Yudhishthira: Sovereign Emperor and Builder of Hindu Rashtra
Given the controversies often seen regarding Yudhishthira and others, we must look to the Mahabharata itself to determine whether Yudhishthira and the other Pandavas were powerful in their own right and embodiments of dharma (righteousness), or if, according to modern propaganda, they were merely dependent on the mercy of Shri Krishna. For the sages repeatedly call him Dharmaraj, and their words cannot be false.
13 September 2026 · 13 min read