Is the Nation Proud of Abhijit Banerjee?

Tactics like the Nobel Prize have been openly used in the propagation and promotion of Western culture. Tolstoy was not awarded the Nobel Prize so as not to offend the Russian Tsar, even though everyone in the West has also believed that there was no greater literary figure in the world than him. There are many such incidents regarding the Nobel Prize.

In a subject like economics, the Nobel Prize should not be awarded at all. Karl Marx's atheism and several other things are bad, though his atheism also flourished after seeing the filth of Christianity; he had absolutely no knowledge of Hindutva. In “Das Kapital”, he wrote an important thing—in the era of Adam Smith and Ricardo, the goal of economics was to find ways to increase the wealth of the nation, but from the era of James Stuart Mill, the very goal of economics changed—instead of the nation, finding ways to increase the profits of joint-stock companies became the primary business of economists.

But in Karl Marx's era, capitalism had banned labor unions, police firing was ordered on strikers, children were subjected to inhumane labor in factories, there was no limit on working hours, and people were fired without notice. Today, the situation has changed across the entire world. Now, capitalism operates under the mask of Marxism, so that real Marxists can be eliminated. The views of people like Amartya Sen and his follower Abhijit Banerjee appear leftist on the surface because they have been writing on the issue of poverty alleviation under "Development Economics". But the slogan of poverty alleviation was first given by US President Roosevelt in the name of the New Deal, when Abhijit Banerjee was not even born. And Abhijit Banerjee's disciple Rahul Vinci, who studied "Development Economics" in Britain and was taught the "NYAY" scheme, was also not born then—where would that 72,000 rupees come from? Marxism raises the slogan that "he who earns shall eat"! Imposing taxes on those who earn and distributing it among the idle is "NYAY" (justice)! This is the philosophy of a desert creed, which calls robbing the earning kafirs (infidels) and distributing it among the desert idlers as the 'justice' of Sharia.

The Indian media will not tell you that Abhijit Banerjee's "Development Economics" emerged from that very desert. With the money of Saudi Arabia's biggest industrialist, Sheikh Abdul Latif Jameel, the Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab was established at MIT in 2003—whose three founders were Abhijit Banerjee, his student-plus-(I do not like the word mistress, but I do not know any civilized word for the relationship Abhijit Banerjee had with his student) Esther Duflo, who has now received the Nobel Prize along with Abhijit Banerjee, and the Tamil-American mathematician Sendhil Mullainathan, who gave a mathematical basis to Abhijit Banerjee's work but was deprived of the prize, nor did he get any important position in the Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab, whose director and co-director were the aforementioned guru-disciple duo.

When Abhijit Banerjee was first introduced to Esther Duflo, she was a 22-year-old student who had just returned from doing research on history in Moscow. It was then that Esther Duflo leaned toward economics; she accepted that "economics" is the only subject that matters (meaning, it provides access to powerful people). Esther Duflo then did her research in economics under the supervision of Abhijit Banerjee, which was approved in 1999 by MIT, where Abhijit Banerjee was a professor, and as soon as she got her degree, she got a job as an assistant professor at the same MIT. MIT is America's most famous institute of technology; in its entire history, no one of such a young age had ever received such a job. Esther Duflo was indeed brilliant! During that research, using the money received in the name of research, Esther Duflo and Abhijit Banerjee stayed together in hotels in India for eighteen months, researching poverty alleviation. Whether they stayed in the same room or in separate rooms, I will not say, but you will understand from the subsequent events.

Abhijit Banerjee was the husband of his youth's 'friend' Arundhati Tuli, with whom he had a son—Kabir, who died. Arundhati Tuli was and is also a professor at the same MIT. But due to Abhijit Banerjee's open relationship with Esther Duflo, he divorced Arundhati Tuli. Even before the divorce from Arundhati Tuli, Abhijit Banerjee and Esther Duflo were living together and had already had a child. After the divorce from Arundhati Tuli, he married Esther Duflo. If Abhijit Banerjee had been an Indian citizen, he would have gone to jail on charges of adultery, and his child would have been called illegitimate, receiving no inheritance.

Abhijit Banerjee did research on poverty alleviation in economics. His own poverty was indeed alleviated. By coaxing Sheikh Muhammad Latif, the son of Sheikh Abdul Latif Jameel, he also got the Poverty Action Lab opened at MIT in his father's name, and using that money, taking leave from classroom teaching, he kept roaming around the world with Esther Duflo doing "research"! What research did they do?

The most important conclusion of all their research is that if one kilogram of lentils is given as an incentive for getting a polio vaccine, more children get vaccinated! When Abhijit Banerjee was a 5-year-old child, I had seen that free apples and milk were given to children in many government primary schools in Delhi so that more children would come to school; when the revenue of the Government of India increased, the mid-day meal scheme was implemented across the country. Welfare projects for poverty alleviation were started by the US President in 1931. The credit for discovering such principles cannot be given to Abhijit Banerjee! Then what new feat did Abhijit Banerjee achieve? His new discovery is simply that most of the money spent by governments in developing countries on poverty alleviation, education, or health, etc., is wasted; if that money is spent through non-governmental organizations like the Sheikh Abdul Latif Poverty Action Lab or the Ford Foundation under the direction of skilled scholars like Abhijit Banerjee, the country's growth rate will increase!

Why did I mention the Ford Foundation? Because Abhijit Banerjee got his job at MIT on a chair established with Ford Foundation funds. The Ford Foundation has had deep ties with the American intelligence agency, the CIA. When Arvind Kejriwal left his job and started his public "career" by opening the "Kabir Foundation", the Ford Foundation had sent dollars in the name of "Kabir Foundation" a month before its registration—Arvind Kejriwal should have been in jail for receiving illegal foreign currency for an unregistered organization, but the Congress government was in power then, and by the time the BJP government was formed at the Center, the media had already made Arvind Kejriwal a "national leader"—so that the massive public anger brewing against Congress corruption could be systematically diverted against the BJP.

It was the CIA itself that had written to the Ford Foundation to help Kejriwal.

The CIA and the Ford Foundation are very concerned about increasing India's economic growth rate, which is the fastest among all major countries in the world. Why are they not concerned about increasing the economic growth rate of their beloved country, America, which lags far behind in growth rate?

Kolkata is proud today that four Kolkatans have received the Nobel Prize—Tagore, Teresa, Amartya Sen, and Abhijit Banerjee. You people should find out who among them was a Hindu and did not eat beef. You people should find out who among them was the actual deserving recipient of the Nobel Prize. Tagore himself had said that if he could write stories like Sarat Chandra Chatterjee, he would be ready to cut off his hand in return!

But Sarat Chandra Chatterjee was never even nominated for any international award—because he did not eat beef. And he did not write in English.

Abhijit Banerjee's most important research conclusion is that poverty is not alleviated by the amount spent directly by the government to remove poverty; poverty is alleviated when that amount is spent in the "right way" (by giving it to the private organizations of highly qualified people like Abhijit Banerjee and Arvind Kejriwal). Then the question arises: why did Abhijit Banerjee, the architect of the Congress "NYAY" scheme that distributes 72,000 rupees to idle people by imposing additional taxes on hardworking earners, not explain how India's growth rate would increase through a scheme that punishes the hardworking people contributing to the country's development and rewards the idle?

The servant of Saudi Sheikh Muhammad Latif knows that the proportion of mazhabis (dogmatic religionists) in India's population is far exceeded by their proportion among the idle. For seven hundred years, the idle learned nothing but looting, rape, murder, etc., because of which, now that the rule of law has been established, they have lagged behind in development—the very thing the Congress's Sachar Commission used to lament.

Jawaharlal Nehru's niece Nayantara had admitted in writing in her book "Relationship" that she used to cheat on her husband and have relations with another man; what she did did not fall under the category of "adultery" under Nehruvian law, because according to Indian law, if a husband does so, it is adultery, but if a wife does so, it is her fundamental right. Jawaharlal's wife had died long ago, so when he implemented such a law, the law of cheating on a wife did not apply to Jawaharlal at all. Such a law was made to protect his sister and her daughter Nayantara. Under this law, Abhijit Banerjee would have gone to jail, so he saved his skin by giving up Indian citizenship. So why should India be proud of him?

When the "Bharat tere tukde honge" (India, you will be broken into pieces) uproar was raised in JNU under the leadership of Kanhaiya, Abhijit Banerjee had issued a statement saying that the police severity being inflicted on students by the BJP government was the same severity that Abhijit Banerjee had faced when he was a student at JNU (meaning Abhijit Banerjee's statement on the Kanhaiya episode was against the Modi government) and that to stop the expulsion of the then student union president, they had gheraoed and forcibly detained the Vice-Chancellor in his own residence—for that hooliganism, Abhijit Banerjee remained in jail for ten days, but the merciful Vice-Chancellor withdrew the case. If the Vice-Chancellor had not shown mercy to the hooligan and had taken proper action, his entire career would have been ruined, and neither the Ford Foundation nor any Sheikh's father could have secured him a job in America.

Ask the blind devotees on what basis the Hindu Hriday Samrat (Emperor of Hindu Hearts) said, "The country is proud of Abhijit Banerjee!" Explain to Modi Ji not to be proud of traitors, anti-Hindus, and anti-BJP elements. After losing in major states like Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, and Chhattisgarh, the Modi government's policies have improved, and the supporters who were angry with them have returned to them. Nowadays they are proceeding on good policies. Do not repeat past mistakes.

(All the above facts can be found on the net.)

– Acharya Shri Vinay Jha

Also read,

The Reality of the Asuri (demonic) Civilization of Mohenjo-daro and Harappa

Madrasa: The Historical Industry of Jihad

Superstitions of Communist Ideology

Why a Muslim Can Never Be a Leftist?

The Betrayal of India's History and Present by Marxist Ideology

Stalin - Whose Propaganda Machine Killed 2 Crore People in Russia

When a Communist Said, "Let the People Taste Blood"!

Nastivadi (negationists) – Criminals Who Deny the Crimes of History