The Unvanquished “Ayodhya” Triumphs Even in Court

"Ayodhya" means that which cannot be conquered through war. Babur invaded, destroyed the temple, and built a mosque; three other ancient temples there were destroyed by Aurangzeb, but until 1858, armed sadhus (ascetics) held possession of the site and never allowed any Muslim to offer namaz (Islamic prayer) at the birthplace of Ram Lalla. When Queen Victoria's rule began in 1858, the weapons of the sadhus in Ayodhya were confiscated in that very year. Between 1858 and 1949, namaz was made to be offered there under British protection, but puja (ritual worship) by Hindus also continued. Thus, "Ayodhya" remained "Ayodhya" indeed!

The highest panchayat (assembly/court) of India has accepted that a temple is not made of bricks and stones but of puja, and since Hindus never stopped the puja of Ram Lalla, the existence of Ram Lalla's temple was never erased. On the other hand, even after Babur, out of 491 years, namaz was offered for only 91 years, and that too on the strength of British weapons. Not even the swords of Babur or Aurangzeb could get namaz offered there even once. Possession of the land remained with the Hindu sadhus, which became the basis of today's judgment. Adi Shankaracharya had ordered armed training for sadhus by organizing them into akharas (monastic martial academies), which is why the akharas fought fiercely against the Mughals.

In 1853 AD, under the leadership of Amir Ali, a feudatory of Awadh, lakhs of Muslims launched an attack to stop the puja of Ram Lalla, against whom lakhs of Hindus entered the battlefield. The British were in conflict with the Nawab, so a battalion joined the battle against Amir Ali; almost the entire battalion was wiped out by the Muslims. However, the Hindus were vast in number, they emerged victorious, and Amir Ali was killed. It was because of this assistance from the British that when they disarmed the sadhus in 1858, the Hindus did not protest. Ever since the Sannyasi (ascetic/renunciant) Rebellion of 1770, wherever British rule was established, the weapons of the sadhus were seized, leaving the akharas as such in name only.

Even in 1934, the dome of the mosque was broken down, but the British had it repaired at government expense. When the murti (sacred image) was installed inside in 1949, the Muslims stopped offering namaz, calling it desecrated, and the District Magistrate, Mr. Nayyar, banned the entry of Muslims and issued an order allowing only Hindus to unlock the gates and perform puja inside. For this reason, Nehru dismissed Mr. Nayyar! Rajiv Gandhi had the locks opened so that Muslims could also go inside, and now Congressmen propagate that Rajiv Gandhi had the locks opened for Hindus!

According to Vastu Shastra (traditional science of architecture), the king's residence should be in the middle of the western part of the city. In present-day Ayodhya, too, such a site is called "Dasharath Mahal", adjacent to which is the birthplace of Ram Lalla, where the central dome of the former Babri Masjid stood. Directly beneath present-day Ayodhya lies ancient Ayodhya. Archaeological reports claim that no evidence of human habitation has been found prior to 700 BC. Similar "evidence" is found throughout the Ganga Valley, on the basis of which the Aryan Invasion Theory is justified and all ancient Indian texts are labeled as mythical.

This fact is deliberately hidden: that the strata prior to 700 BC are submerged in groundwater, requiring excavation by special methods that are unavailable in India and will remain so, because the Macaulayite bureaucracy has neither the mindset nor will their foreign masters allow it.

Regarding Mohenjo-daro, too, it is taught that the lowermost, oldest stratum was the most developed, dating to around 2350 BC, which supposedly proves that a ready-made, developed civilization came from elsewhere and established itself there! The fact is hidden that only 30 strata could be excavated because they are above the groundwater level, while the lower 39 strata are submerged and could not be excavated. If the combined period of the upper 30 strata is about 700 years, then the combined period of the lower 39 strata should be about 910 years, and thus the age of the oldest stratum should be 3260 BC, as has been found in Kalibangan (Chhinnamasta).

Regarding "Balirajgarh" in my district of Madhubani, the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) presented a false report in Parliament claiming that the oldest stratum dates to 150 BC. The then Member of Parliament of that region did not believe it; upon requesting a detailed report, the ASI admitted in writing that the oldest stratum belongs to the NBPW (Northern Black Polished Ware) period, which dates between 650 BC and 150 BC, and that excavation of the lower strata prior to that is impossible due to groundwater! The lowermost stratum of the entire Ganga Valley is indeed the NBPW layer, below which lies groundwater! In some places, because the ancient mound was slightly higher, excavation could go a few centuries deeper, as in Hastinapur or Ahichchhatra. I have read all those reports of the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI).

In the Supreme Court, leftist historian Suvira Jaiswal stated that the oldest stratum of Ayodhya dates to 200–300 BC. Meaning, Ram ji is mythical! The judge's reply was—even if we accept your statement, it is before Christ (BC), isn't it! Meaning, prior to Babur! The court asked all the leftist "experts" summoned by the Muslim side to testify: "What is the basis of whatever statement you have made? Have you read the archaeological report?" All of them said no, they had not read it, and had gathered information through other people's statements and newspapers. The court remarked, "When you have not even read it, how did you become experts? Testimony dismissed!" (All of this is written in the Supreme Court judgment).

Meaning, get out of here, you have come to waste the court's time! I have to deliver the judgment before retiring, I will not let the case drag on by falling into your traps! Ranjan ji has indeed delighted Ram Lalla!

In the attached picture, the 67 acres acquired by the Central Government is currently a vacant, green area, to the north of which lies the disputed site, which is no longer disputed. Now, 70 acres will be handed over to the "trustees" of Ram Lalla, who will not remain under government control. The Nirmohi Akhara has also been ordered to be given a major share in the management.

When the Sunni Waqf Board demanded a mosque, its demand was also met, but away from that site, because it could not prove that namaz was ever offered there before 1858. Even in the 1858 document of the Babri cleric, it is recorded that the name of the mosque was "Janmabhoomi Masjid," which was located inside "Ramkot" destroyed by Aurangzeb—even after the old temple was demolished, the practice of puja and parikrama (circumambulation) by Hindus never stopped, which is the basis on which the judgment was delivered. The testimony of Guru Nanak also proved useful, who had gone to visit the Ram Janmabhoomi two decades before the arrival of Babur—Guru Nanak was a Hindu, which is why he went!

The division ordered by the Allahabad High Court was declared illegal by the Supreme Court because no party had demanded a division. Parasaran ji presented several arguments and evidences that the court has no right to grant a relief that no party has even asked for! His argument was accepted. Nor was Ram Lalla the father of these people, whose inheritance they could divide.

Nowadays, seculars spread false propaganda that K.K. Muhammad excavated the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi temple! I have uploaded the entire judgment of the Supreme Court; in the 1045-page report, there is not a single mention of K.K. Muhammad. All the experts who conducted the excavation and testified in court are mentioned.

Who is pressuring a mahant (abbot) of Ayodhya to embrace Iqbal Ansari and propagate Ganga-Jamuni tehzeeb (syncretic culture)? The tailor's son, by running a bicycle puncture repair shop, "earned" so much from the Samajwadi Party that he used to ride in an Ambassador car to go to court. Now he is "satisfied" with the court's decision, because as the village saying goes, "Helplessness is given the name of Mahatma Gandhi"!

"Ayodhya" is "Ayodhya", everyone is helpless before it! I had already predicted that the graha-yogas (planetary alignments) are auspicious, so if the court delivered a judgment in favor of Ram Lalla, it would be auspicious, and if it delivered a judgment against, it would be highly auspicious because Hindus would then awaken! The court only implements the law; the law is made by Parliament, and Parliament is made by the public. And auspicious graha-yogas bestow wisdom upon the public. "If there is Modi, it is possible" because the public behind Modi makes even Modi possible! Stand firm with Modi so that Modi continues to make the impossible possible. This is just the beginning...

– Acharya Shri Vinay Jha

Read also,

The Truth of Shri Ram, the All-Beloved Form of dharma (righteousness/cosmic order)..

Such should be the grand reconstruction of the Shri Ram Temple in Ayodhya…

Two Sufis had taken a promise from Babur to demolish the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Temple

Building the Ram Temple by consensus would be the suicide of Hindutva

Lord Shri Ram was born this many years ago

6 December 1992, Ayodhya, Political and Cultural Implications

Know what is the relationship between Kailash Mansarovar and Ram Janmabhoomi?

With which animals did Sitaji compare Ravana?